PARTNERS AND SPEAKERS 2009
Federal Ministry of Education and Research AGeNT-D
Nokia Technology Academy Foundation
The Millennium Technology Prize Chinano
Carl Zeiss Shell International Exploration and Production
Daimler BASF - The Chemical Company
Bayer Material Science Lux Research
Saudi Aramco Bax & Willems Consulting Venturing
Thermo Fisher Scientific Nanotechnologie
Hessen-Nanotech NMN
ENNaB INM
CC NanoChem Upob
INCH CeNTech GmbH
NanOP NanoBioNet
NanoMat
GOLD MEDIA PARTNER
MATCHMAKING PARTNER
Technology Review Enterprise Europe Network
GLOBAL PARTNER
OFFICIAL AIRLINE
nano tech 2010 Lufthansa – German Airlines
CO-ORGANISER
LEAD ORGANISER
TU Berlin Spinverse Consulting


Assessing Exposure to Airborne Nanomaterials

Session: Risk Assessment
Starts at: 14:00
Speaker:
Robert Aitken
Director, Strategic Consulting, Institute of Occupational Medicine
Co-Author(s):

Miss Bryony Ross, Institute of Occupational Medicine

Assessing Exposure to Airborne Nanomaterials

Classically, occupational exposure to airborne particles has been characterised in terms of the mass of material present per unit volume (mg/m3). Measurements are based on the workers breathing zone and are taken using personal samplers developed using guidance on inhalable, thoracic, respirable fractions provided in ISO 7708 (1995). Measurement of high aspect ratio particles such as fibres is however based on a different approach and requires counting of these particles to achieve a number concentration. However, the applicability of these traditional approaches to assessment of exposure to nanoparticles is questionable based on published associations between particle toxicity and surface area. A wide range of sampling methods exist, including those which measure mass, particle number, surface area etc. However, in all cases there are limitations in applying these directly to nanoparticle exposure. As a result, there is very little published data concerning assessment of exposure to airborne engineered nanomaterials and the area is currently not well understood. Classification of engineered nanoparticles according to their physicochemical characteristics, and relation of these to health impact-relevant attributes to explore the applicability of different physical exposure metrics to a range of particle class/attribute combinations has been investigated in a recent review by Maynard and Aitken (2007) and this can help with the election of appropriate methods. In this paper we provide a critical review of the methods available for measurement of exposure to engineered nanoparticles and a discussion of their applications and limits, based on recent experimental evidence. References: Maynard A.D. and Aitken R.J. (2007). Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements. Nanotoxicology 1:26-41.


Presentation ID: NTNE2008-317